The Hidden Truth Behind the Forms of Beauty in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale

Sara Rasul Namiq
Iraq, Sulaimanyah
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Chalak Ghafoor Raouf
Department of English Language and Literature University of Human Development Iraq, Sulaimaniayah
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract
this paper theorizes the latest forms of the patriarchal control through analyzing Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale. The paper tries to assume that women in the post-modern age are no longer controlled through the traditional forms of control, but, they are controlled through the forms of beauty such as makeup, fashion, and plastic surgery. Instead of confining women at home, and oppressing them so as to control them, male-dominated societies nowadays are controlling women through beauty experts and their productions. Thus, women are no longer confined at home, and they are no longer oppressed, but, they are working side by side with their male counterparts, and making money just like them, but the problem is that they are spending their money on the forms of beauty. In this way, male societies give women a limited freedom as a key strategy for manipulation in the first step, and then, they try to keep them busy with the forms of beauty so as to make them remain under control. From the late nineteenth century to the post-modern age women have faced numerous challenges. They have been subdued and introverted by the male forms of power, but due to the Industrial Revolution, the technological advancement, and the two world wars, females have been able to open their eyes and see the reality around them. Though, even till this day they are living for the purpose of men and are becoming a symbol for pleasure and an ornament of decoration through the different forms of beauty. So, what this paper tries to do is to discover the hidden truths behind the forms of beauty, and theorize these forms as the latest tools of patriarchal control in the post-modern age.


REFERENCE:
[1] Atwood, Magaret. The Handmaids Tale. London: Random House, 1986. Print.
[2] Barash, Susan Shapiro. Tripping the Prom Queen: The Truth About Women and Rivalry. St. Martin’s Press. New York City. 2006. Print
[3] Barrett, L. Kara. “Victorian Women and Their Working Roles”. State University of New York College. Buffalo: 2013.
[4] Beausoleil, N. “Makeup in everyday life: An inquiry into the practices of urban American  women of diverse backgrounds. In N. Sault (Ed.), Many mirrors: Body image  and social relations”. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. USA: 1992.
[5] Berg, Refresh. “Women’s Work and the Industrial Revolution”. Vol.12. New York:    1991.
[6] Cash, W. David. “Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a  multilevel world”. Ecology and society. Cape town: 2006.
[7] Gallagher, Catherine. The Industrial Reformation of the English Fiction. Chicago: UP of  Chicago, 1985. Print.
[8] Goldin, C. and Sokoloff, K “Women, Children and Indus- trialisation in the Early Republic: Evidence from the Manu- facturing Censuses',Journal of Economic History”.  Wiley.  Belfast: I 982.
[9] Goodman, Jordan and Katrina Honeyman. “Women’s Work, Gender Conflict, and Labour”. Economic History Review. USA: 1991.
[10] Honey, Maureen. “Remembering Rosie: Advertising Images of Women in World War II.” Westport. Greenwood: 1995. 
[11] Johnson, Patricia E., 1951-. Hidden Hands : Working-Class Women and Victorian Social-Problem Fiction. Athens :Ohio University Press, 2001. Print.
[12] Katie, Stoneburner “women and industrialization” HIST 206 Women in European History. USA: 2005.
[13] Kerry, Harnett. “Appearing Modern: Women's Bodies, Beauty, and Power in 1920s America”. Boston College. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2009.
[14] King, C. David. Mariah Marvin, David Weitzman, and Toni Dwiggins. United States History.  Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. USA: 1986. Print.  
[15] Langee, Brenda. The Stock Market Crash of 1929: the end of prosperity. Chelsea House. New York: 2007.
[16] Laura, Fraser. Losing It: America’s Obsession with Weight and the Industry that Feeds on it. Hudson Books. New York: 1997. Print.
[17] Lerner, M. Richard, Karabenick,  A. Stuart. “Relations among physical attractiveness, body attitudes, and self-concept in male and female college students”.  Reilly and Lee Co.  Chicago: 1973.
[18] Mai, Tracy. “To What Extent Were Women’s Contributions in Industries of World War II  Valued?”. Howard High School. Ellicott City: n.d.
[19] Maria, Davidenko. “Discipline and Power in Women’s Beauty Practices in Post-Soviet”.  Crossroads. Russia: 2013.
[20] May, Ernest Richard. War, Boom and Bust: 1917-1932, The Life history of the United States. Time. United States of America: 1964. Print.
[21] Naomi Wolf. “The beauty myth”. Harper Collins. New York: 2002.
[22] Neff, Wanda Fraiken. Victorian Working Women: An Historical and Literary Study of Women in British Industries. New York: AMS Press, 1966. Print
[23] Scott, Sarah. “Influence of Cosmetics on the Confidence of College Women: An Exploratory Study”.  Hanover College. Indiana: n.d.
[24] Susannah, Walker. “Style and Status: Selling Beauty to African American Women”. KY: University Press of Kentucky. Lexington: 2007.
[25] Tennyson, Lord Alfred. The princess. Guttenberg. USA: 1847. Print. 
[26] The National WWII Museum. “Magazine Street” · National Museum. New Orleans: n.d.
[27] Turner, S. L. Hamilton. “The influence of fashion magazines on the body image”. Satisfaction of college women. USA: 1997.